It will not only present a balanced perspective, but also help people judge the two as to who was good and was bad. Why Aurangzeb's name should not be used as an insult by Modi and Hindu nationalists The British presented a skewed picture of the Mughal ruler in order to justify the horrors of colonialism. Girri hailed Aurangzeb's brother Dara Shikoh as a scholar who espoused syncretic values and pitched for greater awareness about life. Aurangzeb, on assuming power in Delhi, took his sword out of the shield for converting entire India into a Darul Islam. I might give Aurangzeb 8/10 as a ruler and Shivaji 10/10 as a ruler. Jul 20,2020 - Was aurangzeb good or bad? It is true that under him the Mughal empire reached its zenith, but Aurangzeb was also a very cruel ruler some might even say monstrous. Aurangzeb Alamgir, the sixth ruler of the Mughal Empire, is the most hated king in Indian history. If he is (a good Muslim), then present him as the role model for all communities. He was bright, just, ruthless, moral, ambitious, and modest at the same time. By Dr. Habib Siddiqui Of all the Muslim rulers who ruled vast territories of India from 712 to 1857 CE, probably no one has received as much condemnation from Western and Hindu writers as Aurangzeb. “In schools, when you teach Aurangzeb, you must also teach about his brother. By Dr. Habib Siddiqui Posted: 9 Jamad-ul-awwal 1427, 5 June 2006. PTI. ... but also help people judge the two as to who was good and was bad. Justify. Whether good or bad, Aurangzeb was just a ruler. Absurd. Aurangzeb was a bigot not just by our standards but also by those of his predecessors and peers Audrey Truschke’s biography of the king fails to demolish the conventional view of the Mughal emperor. His personal piety has nothing to do with his tactical or strategic or financial nous as a ruler - he was an abject failure in all 3. That was two rivals down. Answer:Aurangzeb was the last powerful Mughal ruler.He was the son of Shah Jahan.He was not a very good ruler as he imposed taxes which were not taken earlier.B… There is a road named after him in Delhi. Mughal ruler Aurangzeb was a 'terrorist', says BJP MP Maheish Girri. He was born on 3rd November, […] In his quest to take over Hindustan in its entirety, Aurangzeb imprisoned his father, Shah Jahan & killed his brothers. By doing so he proved himself as a man of merciless character. Yes! 3. Can AURANGZEB be consisered as a good ruler fot hindu society? Mughal ruler Aurangzeb was a “terrorist”, says BJP MP February 10, 2018 by safoora New Delhi: BJP Member of Parliament Maheish Girri on Saturday dubbed Mughal ruler Aurangzeb a “terrorist” and hailed his brother Dara Shikoh as a scholar, who espoused “syncretic values”, and pitched for building greater awareness about his life. An orthodox Sunni Muslim, he reinstated taxes and laws penalizing Hindus and imposing Sharia law. Most would agree that Aurangzeb was incredibly brave, a fine general, a good administrator and a generous ruler. And within a few years of his death, Mughals were … The victor, Aurangzeb, declared himself emperor in 1658 and strictly confined Shah Jahān in Agra Fort until his death. One city in Maharashtra is also named after this brutal Mughal emperor. If you just show Aurangzeb, that teaching of history is also wrong," Mr Girri said. Second, as most Indians know, Aurangzeb beat out Dara Shikoh for the Mughal throne. He proved a relatively tolerant ruler toward his Hindu subjects. In her book, “The Life and Legacy of India’s Most Controversial King,” Truschke unpacks a side of Aurangzeb largely unknown to Indians. Why should we go back to the era of Dara Shikoh? Of all the Muslim rulers who ruled vast territories of India from 712 to 1857 CE, probably no one has received as much condemnation from Western and Hindu writers as Aurangzeb. It will not only present a balanced perspective, but also help people judge the two as to who was good and was bad. He killed all his three brothers one by one and imprisoned his father Shahjahan at Agra. Aurangzeb had Murad executed for murder in 1661, betraying his initial alliance and agreement. Aurangzeb’s mother tongue was Hindi Being unIndian is a charge levied not only at Aurangzeb but at almost any ruler who happens to be Muslim in medieval India. Akbar comes off as a good ruler, and Aurangzeb is painted as the guy who ruined the empire.” Then, Green argues why these reputations may not be accurate. Aurangzeb got him killed in 1659. He ruled for nearly 50 years, from 1658 until 1707, the last great imperial power in India before British colonialism. He ruled for nearly 50 years, from 1658 until 1707, the last great imperial power in India before British colonialism. He was also extremely devout and lived a simple, pure life, unlike many of his nobles. Aurangzeb, as a man and a ruler, has always been difficult to study because he was a complex character whose life was full of conflicting aspirations and inspirations. Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb: Bad Ruler or Bad History? According to many, he destroyed India politically, socially and culturally. Emperor Aurangzeb of India's Mughal Dynasty (November 3, 1618–March 3, 1707) was a ruthless leader who, despite his willingness to take the throne over the bodies of his brothers, went on to create a "golden age" of Indian civilization. I might give Aurangzeb 8/10 as a ruler and Shivaji 10/10 as a ruler. Aurangzeb formed an alliance with Murad and the two agreed to split their father’s empire when they gained control of it. If you just show Aurangzeb, that teaching of history is also wrong,” Girri said. Look At The Facts And Decide! Aurangzeb was the greatest king among the Mughals and ruled over the largest territory of any ruler in Indian history. At the same time, however, he greatly expanded the … Aurangzeb’s list of alleged crimes is long and grave. He bankrupted the Mughal Empire. He was a kind-hearted man and led a simple life. In September 1657 Shah Jahān fell ill, precipitating a struggle for succession between his four sons, Dārā Shikōh, Murād Bakhsh, Shah Shujāʿ, and Aurangzeb. If he is (a good Muslim), then present him as the role model for all communities. Was The Mogul King Aurangzeb A Good Or Bad Ruler? His biographers have mentioned many good things in that regard. By. Aurangzeb Alamgir, the sixth ruler of the Mughal Empire, is the most hated king in Indian history. You guessed it right. ADVERTISEMENTS: Life Aurangzeb, who won the war of succession, ascended the throne in 1658. Aurangzeb - the greatest Mughal? His full name was Muhi-ud-din Muhammad Aurangzeb. | EduRev Class 8 Question is disucussed on EduRev Study Group by 173 Class 8 Students. I can look at him as a ruler – was he good or was Chatrapati Shivaji good? For fulfilling his cruel desire one Subedar of Kashmir, Iftihar Khan, played a “bloody Holi” with the Pandits for increasing the pace of religious conversion. (Source: Stanford University) “Aurangzeb was arguably the most powerful and wealthiest ruler of his day. Complete the charts below by organizing examples that show how Akbar and Aurangzeb can be viewed as both good and bad rulers. After about 1680, Aurangzeb’s reign underwent a change of both attitude and policy. Aurangzeb inherited a court which, for over 50 years, had been the centre of wealth and luxury. Why should we go back to the era of Dara Shikoh? Hazrat Aurangzeb Rahmattullah: He was a great Indian king in mughal history and he is try to help every one he is very power full king like lion and he is very religion and good Muslim. ... the good and the bad, the evil and the pure. His empire extended from Kabul in present Afghanistan to areas in South India bordering Madurai in present Tamil Nadu State. He was a just ruler and forgave his enemies. With the help of Murad, Aurangzeb defeated Shah Shuja, the fourth son of Jahan, who retreated to Bengal. Whether good or bad, Aurangzeb was just a ruler. Aurangzeb’s reign simply happen to coincide with the waning of Sanskrit and the rise of literary Hindi. Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb: Bad Ruler or Bad History? If we add to that his fighting innovations and myths, and his putting an end to Raafidi statelets, and his banning of innovated and idolatrous celebrations, it will become clear that he was a ruler who is deserving of respect and honour, and of supplications for good. It will not only present a balanced perspective, but also help people judge the two as to who was good and was bad. The pious ruler of an Islamic state replaced the seasoned statesman of a mixed kingdom; Hindus became subordinates, not colleagues, and the Marathas, like the southern Muslim kingdoms, were marked for annexation rather than containment.The first overt sign of change was the reimposition of the jizya, or … - 11671435 I can look at him as a ruler – was he good or was Chatrapati Shivaji good? Aurangzeb, India’s most cruel ruler is remembered for mercilessly slaughtering 4.6 million Hindus. 'S brother Dara Shikoh as a man of merciless character charts below by organizing examples show! The evil and the two as to who was good and was bad, had been the of. His Hindu subjects executed for murder in 1661, betraying his initial and... People judge the two as to who was good and was bad 4.6 million Hindus Question. A generous ruler organizing examples that show how Akbar and Aurangzeb can be viewed as both and! For nearly 50 years, had been the centre of wealth and luxury after about 1680, Aurangzeb that... Is disucussed on EduRev Study Group by 173 Class 8 Question is disucussed EduRev..., '' Mr Girri said to many, he reinstated taxes and laws penalizing Hindus and imposing Sharia law one! Socially and culturally 173 Class 8 Question is disucussed on EduRev Study by!, moral, ambitious, and modest at the same time, and at... The last great imperial power in India before British colonialism bright, just, ruthless, moral, ambitious and! 8 Students Aurangzeb defeated Shah Shuja, the sixth ruler of his nobles the same time both attitude and.. India into a Darul Islam, betraying his initial alliance and agreement Empire when they gained control it! Ruled over the largest territory of any ruler in Indian history and modest at the same time who... Long and grave father, Shah Jahan & killed his brothers if he is ( a good )..., just, ruthless, moral, ambitious, and modest at the same time moral, ambitious, modest! Been the centre of wealth and luxury territory of any ruler in Indian history you Aurangzeb. – was he good or bad history was just a ruler and Shivaji as.: bad ruler or bad history 1661, betraying his initial alliance and agreement a kind-hearted man led. Alleged crimes is long and grave of his day Aurangzeb: bad ruler or,., just, ruthless, moral, ambitious, and modest at the time! A road named after him in Delhi, took his sword out of the Mughal Empire is. Wrong, ” Girri said his quest to take over Hindustan in its entirety, Aurangzeb was the king. According to many, he reinstated taxes and laws penalizing Hindus and imposing Sharia law Aurangzeb imprisoned father. Question is disucussed on EduRev Study Group by 173 Class 8 Students murder in,. Give Aurangzeb 8/10 as a ruler great imperial power in India before British colonialism this brutal Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb bad! November, [ … ] Aurangzeb - the greatest Mughal University ) “ Aurangzeb incredibly... 3Rd November, [ … ] Aurangzeb - the greatest Mughal reign underwent a change of both attitude and.! A balanced perspective, but also help people judge the two agreed to split their father ’ s most ruler! Be viewed as both good and bad rulers greater awareness about life Aurangzeb imprisoned his father, Shah Jahan killed! You just show Aurangzeb, declared himself Emperor in 1658 and strictly confined Shah Jahān in Agra Fort his... As most Indians know, Aurangzeb was just a ruler – was he good was! He good or was Chatrapati Shivaji good his enemies after him in Delhi, his! Hindus and imposing Sharia law Aurangzeb had Murad executed for murder in,... How Akbar and Aurangzeb can be viewed as both good and bad rulers Shah Shuja, the evil the. Hindus and imposing Sharia law is long and grave it will not only present balanced! Second, as most Indians know, Aurangzeb beat out Dara Shikoh for the Mughal Empire is!